Cerebus #219 (June 1997) Art by Dave Sim & Gerhard |
(from 'Dave Sim Responds To The Fantagraphics Offer' at TCJ.com, 29 September 2012)
...I'm not sure what the point of all the political discussions we're
having here is. Lurking behind the discussion seems to be the
assumption (perhaps on Sim's part and that of his allies) that whoever
publishes Cerebus should share Sim's politics. There is the further
assumption that the best person to write an introduction to Cerebus is
someone who is broadly simpatico not just with Sim's aesthetic aims but
also his politics and very idiosyncratic worldview. But if we think
about it, there is no necessity for politics and publishing to be in
alignment in this way. Chris Oliveros [Drawn & Quartely publisher] is far from being a libertarian,
but that doesn't prevent him from doing an excellent job keeping Chester Brown in print. Fantagraphics publishes cartoonists with a diversity of
political points of view: Carl Barks was classical conservative and Peter Bagge is a libertarian, as is (if I remember rightly) Rick Altergott. I actually don't know the politics of most Fanta cartoonists
(or most cartoonists in general). In literature, James Laughlin during
his distinguished tenure at New Directions published many writers of the
right (Ezra Pound, Celine, Mishima, Kenner) but also many liberals
and radicals (George Oppen, W.C. Williams, Guy Davenport). Aside from
his first two books, William F. Buckley almost always worked with
liberal editors and publishers. As a Hemingway expert, Sim is probably
aware that Maxwell Perkins didn't necessarily agree with the politics of
his authors (who in any case had divergent politics).
For that matter critics and other readers don't have to be in
sympathy with a writer's politics to enjoy it, especially if we are
talking about a work of imaginative literature. Simply as a matter of
fact, a critic or historian or analyst can be fair to an artist despite
ideological disagreement. Hugh Kenner was a conservative Catholic in the
National Review mould, but he was wonderfully appreciative of Louis Zukofsky and George Oppen, left-liberal Jews with a strong Marxist past.
The socialist Irving Howe was equally insightful, and even
good-naturedly affectionate, when writing about Kipling. And Fredric Jameson's Marxism hasn't prevented him from being a persuasive advocate
on behalf of Wyndham Lewis, who can fairly be described as a fascist
fellow traveler. Back when he was a radical, Christopher Hitchens wrote
very good appreciations of several right-wing authors (Anthony Powell, Waugh, etc). Speaking for myself, I'll say that I have a very high
regard for all sorts of writers and cartoonists whose politics I don't
share: Harold Gray, for one, also Ditko, Barks, Bagge, and Chester Gould. Not to mention T.S. Eliot, Evelyn Waugh, Ezra Pound, Wyndham Lewis, Kingsley Amis, Philip Larkin, and countless others).
All of the authors mentioned above are writers who have politics
that are far more repugnant to most people than Sim's (here is Larkin's
political manifest: "Prison for strikers / Bring back the cat, / Kick
out the n*****s – / How about that?"). Yet they remain in print and have
an audience (as do on the opposite end of the spectrum communist
writers like Neruda and Sartre). So I suspect that if Cerebus doesn't
have the audience Dave Sim would like, it's not primarily because of
politics. It may very well be because of format and accessibility. The
types of people who would like an epic world-building graphic novel
aren't going to like the format Sim is offering it in (and may very well
not want to step into a comic book store). So the best move forward for
Sim is to negotiate with a publisher like Fantagraphics (or someone
comparable) who can bring Cerebus out in a more accessible & popular
format.
Jeet Heer is a Toronto based journalist who focuses on arts and culture. He is co-editor, with Kent Worcester, of Arguing Comics: Literary Masters On A Popular Medium (University of Mississippi Press). With Chris Ware and Chris Oliveros, he is editing a series of volumes reprinting Frank King’s Gasoline Alley (Drawn and Quarterly), and he has written introductory essays to George Herriman’s Krazy & Ignatz (Fantagraphics).
4 comments:
Paragraph one is full of assumptions and straw men. The rest is fine. You can like Dave Sim's work and not agree with him. I think much has been established and agreed upon.
David Birdsong
What I can't understand is why Dave Sim isn't allowing Fantagraphics to print the entire run, or at least a large portion of Cerebus. After following the correspondance, I couldn't understand, or believe his reasoning in regards to this NYT fetish he has. He must understand that this deal would bring Cerebus into thousands of public libraries just like Love and Rockets, in addition to the increased book store distribution and reviews. I know he at one point expressed concern of it's longevity, so why not do this? And if he's to be believed, why not take the film option money, if he's truly in need. Even if the film is produced, people will be able to seperate the two mediums, + even if it's bad it would still bring alot of publicity, hence become a bigger seller than it is now.
There are other publishers. How 'bout that Doctor Who cover for IDW?
I agree, there are other publishers, of course, and Dave Sim is still doing excellent work. Very good to see his art getting out in the shops.
Post a Comment