Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Going Home page 330

MARGARET LISS:
A few years ago I scanned all of Dave Sim's notebooks. He had filled 36 notebooks during the years he created the monthly Cerebus series, covering issues #20 to 300, plus the other side items -- like the Epic stories, posters and prints, convention speeches etc. A total of 3,281 notebook pages detailing his creative process. I never really got the time to study the notebooks when I had them. Just did a quick look, scanned them in and sent them back to Dave as soon as possible. So this regular column is a chance for me to look through those scans and highlight some of the more interesting pages.

We've looked at Dave's notebook #26 before numerous times. The notebook started out as a 300 page notebook broken up into three sections, and only 150 pages were scanned: section 1 had 63 pages scanned, section 2 had 65 pages scanned, and section 3 had 22 pages scanned. There were only 11 pages missing, and the rest were blank.

I had made a note that I took two scans of page 45. My note: "p.045: Has an 'a' and a 'b' version: There are two photocopied pictures on this page one of which overlaps another. So the 'a' scan is with the 2nd picture, of a page of script, hidden. The 'b' picture has the script photocopy visible. The top one is only held on by a piece of masking tape, the other photocopies are glued on to the page."

Here is page 45 as is, how it looks when you flip the page to see it:

Notebook 26, page 45, with the sketch on top
The photocopied sketch is on top of a photocopy of a typed script. I looked through the rest of the notebook to see if the sketch was there, but it wasn't. You can see a bit of of the script underneath the sketch, and it says issue 248 (NOV 99) page four, page 330. The sketch is of that page that the script underneath it is for. In fact, the hidden bit of script is for page 3 in its entirety.

Notebook 26, page 45, with the sketch moved
Now you can see the script for page 5 of issue #248. Here is the finished page:

Going Home, page 330
The script on the bottom of the page is for page 331 of Going Home. The notes Dave wrote to himself that aren't part of the comic are crossed out. Like he didn't have time to turn to a notebook and write down his thoughts for later, he just kept typing away and put them down as he had them.







Catching Up... in Hell?


Sean Michael Robinson:

Greetings folks!

It's been quite the seven day stretch, with lots of balls in the air...

Going Home is in production at Marquis. I received the "proofs" on Monday, which allowed me to catch a few minor last-minute items which needed to be discussed with their prepress department. Even though proofs are decidedly not what they used to be, it's still very helpful to see the entire thing in print, of some form, before running the press. After all, even if you think you set up everything perfectly on your end, even if you checked it twice or thrice—did you really send the right file for the interior cover? Did you make sure that the pages are all exactly in order, and have their page numbers? Really? Well, part of their prepress process involves pagination, stripping the book back to single pages and reassembling them in the order required by the forms and plates required to print those forms. This is mostly automated but also involved some individual judgment. Are you sure you want to trust this completely to automation? Did someone decide to "correct" a page that was tilted to indicate drunkenness or shock? Did someone flag a page because the text was unreadable, despite the fact that the story calls for it to be unreadable right there? Did you not notice that a panel of text had long-ago fallen off the original art board?

All of these things can happen. All of these things will happen, if you don't check, and then check again.

Anyway.

So I've been in quick-response mode the past week, so that any request from Marquis gets acted on immediately so as not to delay the book. Working on some advertisements for the books as well, as discussed by Dave in this space. And finally, prepping the files for Cerebus in Hell? #0 so that it can join the Marquis line-up for printing.

Huh? Prepping Cerebus in Hell? Isn't it done?

It's a really interesting thing to me, that Dave chose Gustave Dore's illustrations of Inferno (part one of The Divine Comedy) to use as raw material with Cerebus In Hell? Not only are they fantastically inventive, visually rich images, they're all of those things on the terms of the time. That is, the method they were produced, and reproduced, is very much linked to the culture and technology of the time period in which they were created.

Which is why it was so interesting to me when Dave suggested, via fax, that the strips would be less funny to him, personally, if Cerebus' dot tone was replaced with gray.

I've spent a lot of time on AMOC writing about why it is that, in a world where you can get magnificent color printing on a photocopy machine at your local office supply store, print products of historical materials still look so uniformly bad. More to the point is this post from three weeks ago, on what exactly can cause moire when reproducing line art with mechanical tones, like Cerebus' mechanical tone.

The short, philosophical version? The ever-present modern techniques of reproduction—be they halftoning for color reproduction, or low-resolution brick-stair-stepped additive color on a screen, are antithetical to the older techniques used to create the illusion of gray on paper with only black ink.

This applies just as much to Dore's illustrations for Inferno as it does to Cerebus.


A screen-resolution scan of an exceptional copy of a plate from Inferno. Notice the diagonal lines on the tomb surface? That's moire-- the actual hatching lines in that area follow the surface of the rock. The amount and severity of the moire depends on the scale of the scan, the softness of the image, and the pitch of the "screen" (whether pixels or printing dots) it's being viewed through. Seen soft and reduced, as it appears on the screen-res Cerebus In Hell, it's not a big deal. Seen in print, with halftoning thrown into the mix, and it can be the difference between really nice images and really nice images with random patterns splashed on them.

Have you ever seen an original edition of a Dore-illustrated book in person? They're truly a marvel. Rich black ink, raised on the surface so much that you can touch and feel it, an indentation at the edge of the impression where the pressure of the press and block have grooved the paper permanently. Consistent tone, sometimes with flat mechanical parallel strokes, on other surfaces perfectly rendered undulating lines that illustrate form and texture as well as light. All of this contributes the the stroboscopic effect of the illustration, the feeling that the foreground is rising above the surface of the page, in an attempt to leave the paper world behind.

These illustrations were created on large pieces of boxwood, which Dore drew on directly in pencil and chalk, carefully building up tone before sending them off to his collaborators, who engraved the wood to his specifications, cutting away the uninked areas of the image and using the tone drawings as a guide. They used a variety of tools to make the engravings, including mechanical ruling machines that could produce toned areas with great precision by moving a certain measured distance down after each stroke.These inverted engraved "originals" were them multiplied for print production purposes using a process called electrotyping,:

Electrotyping (also galvanoplasty) is a chemical method for forming metal parts that exactly reproduce a model. The method was invented by Moritz von Jacobi in Russia in 1838, and was immediately adopted for applications in printing and several other fields.[1] As described in an 1890 treatise, electrotyping produces "an exact facsimile of any object having an irregular surface, whether it be an engraved steel- or copper-plate, a wood-cut, or a form of set-up type, to be used for printing; or a medal, medallion, statue, bust, or even a natural object, for art purposes."[2] In art, several important "bronze" sculptures created in the 19th century are actually electrotyped copper, and not bronze at all;[3] sculptures were executed using electrotyping at least into the 1930s.[4] In printing, electrotyping had become a standard method for producing plates for letterpress printing by the late 1800s
...
Electrotyping was also used to produce entire printing plates directly from the formes composed from movable type and illustrations. In this application, electrotyping was a higher quality but more costly alternative to stereotyping, which involved casting of type metal into a mold prepared from the forme. Stereotyping had been invented around 1725, and was already well-established when electrotyping was invented in 1838. Both methods yielded plates that could be preserved in case of future needs, for example in the printing of novels and other books of unpredictable popularity. The movable type used to compose the original forme could then be re-used. Both methods could be used to prepared curved plates for rotary presses, which were used for the longest print runs. The widespread adoption of electrotyping for this use occurred after mechanical electrical generators (dynamos) became commonly available around 1872. These generators supplanted the whole rooms of chemical batteries (Smee cells) that were previously used to provide electricity for electrotyping. Batteries did not have the electrical capacity needed to rapidly deposit the electrotype (or "electro"). The advent of plating dynamos sped up electrotyping twenty times or more, so that an electrotype printing plate could be deposited in less than two hours. In addition, the chemical batteries gave off toxic fumes that had required their isolation in separate rooms.


Here's a look at a block (actually blocks, as boxwood was quite small) used in the production of Harper's Weekly. Thanks, BYU Library!)

But, just like the dot-tone used to make Cerebus appear gray, the mechanical hatching used to produce tone in these illustrations causes moire if subjected to what are now normal printing processes—halftoning, or display on a low-resolution screen. 

Additionally, because they were produced with such fine lines, if you want the effect of the original illustration, and not just the general sense of its composition, you'll need scans of a sufficiently high enough resolution to resolve these tiny lines.


Why hello, Satan, you're looking pretty good all smooth and reduced like that, now that I can't perceive any actual lines, only the tone that the lines used to create.


But, uh, what in the world is up with your rocks, Satan? Is there an unholy strobe light filling your chamber?



Virgil, Virgil, your infernal half-toning is only making it worse!!

Which is all to say, I'm replacing all of the Gustave Dore images (which look good on screen currently, but will look not very good in print) with higher-resolution scans  from the best-looking print copy of Inferno I can find. The Cerebus figures will be similarly scaled in such a way as to prevent moire as well.

The actual work will take very little time per page, once I can start it. But it is a bit of a delay getting access to a good copy of Inferno. Fortunately, they're very numerous, and thanks to the electrotyping process detailed above, some editions were being printed from the "original" blocks even into the 20th century, making purchasing a good edition not very painful on the wallet, once it's been located.

I'm wary of publicly stating which of these editions is undervalued until I've secured mine, so more on that later...

So! What have I been up to? Ensuring that, not only will CIH #0 be funny as... Hell? but that it'll be a beautiful book to boot!

Is it strange that a humor book might end up with the best-reproduced Inferno images in a century?

Or is it funny?

Hm.


Tuesday, 13 September 2016

Carson Grubaugh's Re-Read Challenge: Flight

CARSON GRUBAUGH: 
(from Carson's Re-Read Blog, August 2016)
...The Mothers and Daughters storyline is at its most basic level an examination of matriarchy and womanhood. One of the major plot devices during these volumes is the telepathic group-mind powers exhibited by the new matriarchs, the Cirinists. Sim himself has long drawn a connection between Marxism/Socialism and Feminism and believes that a matriarchal society would be socialist in nature. It is no surprise then, that during this time period Sim follows suit and engages in projects that are wrapped up in collective action and inclusion... [Read the full review here...]

CARSON GRUBAUGH'S
CEREBUS RE-READ CHALLENGE:
Cerebus Vol 8: Women
Cerebus Vol 9: Reads
Cerebus Vol 10: Minds
Cerebus Vol 11: Guys
Cerebus Vol 12: Rick's Story
Cerebus Vol 13: Going Home
Cerebus Vol 14: Form & Void
Cerebus Vol 15: Latter Days
Cerebus Vol 16: The Last Day

Monday, 12 September 2016

George & Dan's Cerebus Statue



Cerebus statue by George Gatsis & Dan Grant.

Saturday, 10 September 2016

On Sale 15 Years Ago: Cerebus #270

Cerebus #270 (September 2001)
Art by Dave Sim, photo by Ken Sim, cover technician Chris Verhoeven


Diamond Order Code: OCT140536

Friday, 9 September 2016

Howard Chaykin

(First Comics, 1983-1988)
DAVE SIM:
(from the Cerebus Yahoo Group Q&A, August 2004)
...Howard Chaykin I always admired a great deal. Very intimidating fellow, very sure of himself. I was terrifically impressed back in 1982 when Deni and I had dinner with him and his then-wife Leslie on the first US Tour that he was planning to do an on-going book called American Flagg! whose theme he neatly encapsulated as "the future is the same as the present, only later and more so." That's awfully good. That's very Howard. One good sentence can save you fifteen minutes of explanation, so come up with it, schmuck. It was particularly interesting for me because it was going to be a monthly book and I was already becoming conscious of the fact that there weren’t a whole lot of those in the new direct market age. Of course, to Howard we weren’t in the same league. I was still a strange kind of semi-pro fanzine publisher, which was the reaction to Cerebus and Elfquest. Being in the comic-book field meant living in New York and all that that entailed. Of course now it seems very natural to mention Cerebus and American Flagg! in the same sentence, but not back then. 

I have several Howard Chaykin stories that have stayed with me over the years. I already told one in the Synchronicity Triptych essay. Back in 1974 when I first met him doing an interview with him for Comic Art News & Reviews he had long hair down to his shoulders and mutton-chop sideburns. Very Neil Young. Overnight, at some point, he realized that this was a mistake. He was living in New York, he was a grown-up who was interested in having a solid career in comic books AND in commercial illustration and he realized that, in the latter category, you weren’t doing yourself any favours showing up for meetings with art directors looking like a Woodstock leftover. The sixties were ten years ago. Get over it. But that also put him in a "minority of one" situation. I can’t think of any comic-book creator of his generation in the mid-70s who didn’t look like a Woodstock leftover, and the community was (and, I assume, still is) particularly brutal with anyone who breaks ranks with the pack. But, I have to hand to him, he didn’t go halfway and get a 1964 Beatle haircut and just shorten his sideburns and start wearing new jeans. He got his hair cut very short -- shaved on the sides -- bought fashionable dress clothes beautifully cut and tailored and suspenders (which were just then coming into fashion in chic New York circles). The whole nine yards. And, at some point he had to be, you know, seen like this in a comic-book environment. And, again, I have to hand it to him. He didn’t try to put on some Woodstock disguise. This was the choice he had made, this was what he was going to look like. So, as the story goes, he walks into either Marvel or DC one day and sees (whoever it was -- the first comic book person who was going to be exposed to the New Howard Chaykin), walks right up to them with a big grin and an outstretched hand and says (by way of introduction): "Hi. Joe Nazi."

I also remember having dinner with Howard and an excruciatingly young Frank Miller right around the time the first few issues of Frank’s Daredevil had come out. I’m pretty sure that this was pre-Upstarts, the studio that Howard and Frank later had with Walt Simonson. I was virtually non-existent at that dinner. As I say, I existed on Howard’s radar screen but somewhere between fanzine and professional, a quirky kid. It was a very interesting dinner, though, because it was largely an uninterrupted monologue/interrogation of Frank by Howard. What did Frank want to accomplish, how were things going with his editor, when the editor said that did it have this sort of tone or that sort of tone, is Frank aware of the pitfalls in, etc. etc. I remember Frank being very quiet through most of the dinner, mostly nodding, a lot of shrugging, but a very intense look on his face because he realized what he was getting for free here -- a dense-packed education on the ins and outs and why’s and wherefores of suddenly being a Big Name in the comic-book field. Because it had nothing to do with me -- as far as I could see I would never have to make my way through the labyrinthine maze/gauntlet that is a New York City comic-book career (otherwise I would’ve been making my own mental notes on every word out of Howard’s mouth) -- I was able to observe the whole process from a greater remove and what struck me was Howard Chaykin’s sheer open-hearted generosity in doing this. Howard was far enough along in his career at this point that it was obvious he was never going to be in the category he was educating Frank about. That category happens overnight, the fact that it happens overnight is a big part of it. If you’ve been working in comics for five years you can’t suddenly make that leap. Neal Adams was in that category. Steranko was in that category. Wrightson was in that category. Howard was a very career-minded individual and ferociously competitive and, in context -- particularly in the brutal world of the New York City Funnybook Industry -- he could certainly be forgiven for taking a “sink or swim” approach to Frank Miller (there were always better-than-average odds that they might end up competing for a plum assignment somewhere up ahead). But, he didn’t do that. He went out of his way to give Frank the advantage of every scrap of information he himself had gleaned  -- since he had been Gil Kane’s assistant -- about the situation in which Frank had suddenly found himself. 

The only time I found myself in a comparable situation was in 1993 when Bonemania hit. As I told Jeff at the time, I was quite a ways away from ground zero when this happened to the Pinis and I was only marginally closer when it happened to Kevin and Peter (the only two comparable self-publishing success stories) but here is everything that I know about being an overnight skyrocket success in independent comics. Since there were a lot of self-publishers that I was helping at the time in various ways, there was always the temptation to give Jeff the same sort of limited access that I gave them (always having to bear in mind that I had my own monthly comic book to write and draw). If it hadn’t been for Howard’s example, I don’t think I would’ve given Jeff as much time as I did, dense-packing as much as I knew about the ins and outs and whys and wherefores of being an overnight hit in independent comic books. 

Oddly enough, one of the few moments when I did enter the conversation (mentally, anyway) at that long-ago dinner was when Howard offered the opinion that the comic-book collector’s market was crazy because people were buying and selling the first issue of Marvel’s Star Wars comic book for (I think, at the time, it was around $20 -- it goes for around $60 now, according to the latest Overstreet Price Guide) and it wasn’t anywhere close to being Howard’s best work. Howard drew the cover of the first issue and pencilled the first ten. That was the first time that I had known Howard Chaykin to perceive something inaccurately. Which was understandable in a way. George Lucas had made no secret of the fact that Han Solo had been based to a large degree on the prototypical Howard Chaykin space and/or pulp hero, as typified by Cody Starbuck, the Scorpion and Monarch Starstalker. Sort of Gil Kane’s “laughing cavalier” with a lop-sided grin on his face. I’m pretty sure that this was the reason that Chaykin landed the assignment to do the comic-book adaptation (and the reason Al Williamson was tapped to do the newspaper strip. Whatever Lucas didn’t get from Chaykin, he got from Williamson, thematically and visually). But, I thought at the time that Howard was overlooking the obvious—the book was commanding those prices because it was Star Wars, not because of whomever was writing and drawing it. At the same time his reaction was understandable, one of those molar-grinding incidents of being at a one-step remove from a worldwide mega-hit. How could you do your best work when you could see that Han Solo wasn’t any sort of improvement on Cody Starbuck, but just a watered-down Hollywoodized version of same? 

I have to admit at this point that I didn’t -- and still haven’t -- read American Flagg. I read, I think, the first three issues and just found the ironic “adult” tone uninteresting. No, that’s not fair. I did find it interesting, but, for me, it just suffered in comparison to The Scorpion: the previous example of Howard doing the whole package on his own for Atlas/Seaboard. From the splash page with its white handwritten captions and craft-tinted “photo album” panels, it seemed to me that The Scorpion was the book Howard had been born to draw. American Flagg! seemed to me like a parody of The Scorpion -- we’re all adults here, we don’t take this sort of material seriously. I really should read Flagg sometime. There’s no question in my mind that it is a better piece of material than the vast majority of what I’ve retained over the years. I understand there’s an anniversary edition of it coming out this year, so I’ll keep my eye out. 

At the 1986 San Diego Comicon, Gerhard’s first experience with San Diego, I had told him about all the great parties that they had there and how you just went from one to the other all night. So, it was more than a little embarrassing when we checked into our suite and then went out to all of the primary convention hotels, literally going from floor-to-floor listening. You know, “Where de party at?” Finally we gave up and went back to our suite on the top floor of the Holiday Inn Embarcadero. “Well,” I said. “I guess we’ll have to have the party.” So, I made up a quick invitation and got the hotel to photocopy thirty of them. Nice sized party, I figured. Eventually two hundred people showed up, but there were only thirty invitations and one of them I had definitely given to Howard Chaykin. I had also printed up proposals for a handful of artists if they were interested in doing a book through Aardvark One International. I think I had four or five packages made up for people I knew were going to be at the show. One was Howard. Jaime Hernandez was another. But, anyway, the party was going pretty good when Howard walked in. “Howard,” I said. “Here. Just in case you’re ever looking for a publisher for a project.” He flipped through the proposal. “Dave,” he said, in his matter-of-fact tone, “Are you hustling me?” A little taken aback by the verb, I stammered something about well, yeah, I guess you could call it that. He said, “You’ve said some negative things about me in print which I don’t take very seriously because when I think of you I remember a pimply-faced teenager with stringy hair interviewing me for his fanzine. So, let’s resolve never to work together on anything ever.” He handed the proposal back and said, “Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go and enjoy myself.” And he wandered off into the depths of the party. 

What Howard was referring to was my “Declaration of Independence” in The Comics Journal No.105 where I described the “inverted pyramid” of traditional comic-book publishing. I wrote: 
“The inverted pyramid is difficult to disguise…but then, little effort is expended in doing so. ‘First Comics! You can count on us.’ (this was the motto of First Comics, publishers of American Flagg among other titles) (This means you can count on Rick Obadiah, Rick Oliver, the production guys.) ‘We publish one of your favourite characters -- American Flagg!’ (As Mike Gold says, ‘A great character is forever -- a fresh approach is what’s needed, that’s all.”) “created and written by Howard Chaykin, Joe Staton artist.” (Doesn’t really matter who does it, right? A great character is forever.)
This approach is a betrayal of the fans, the readers, the shop owners, the distributors and everyone who had a stake in American Flagg!, emotional or financial. The back issues will decline in value, a slap in the face to those distributors and shop owners who now have boxes of dead or dying wood-pulp they will be forced to sell at cost or below. Chaykin’s assurances all along that “he can’t foresee leaving Flagg!” gave a false message to the marketplace in which economy functions (Flagg! Is, after all, a direct-sales-only comic). The fans feel betrayed because they had come to rely on Chaykin’s Flagg! month-in and month-out; and, more importantly, had been given no indication that this situation could or would change. 

If, as I have heard, Chaykin planned it this way all along, we can chalk up another victory for the inverted pyramid. Had this been the ‘independent comic’ it had been declared to be (and I’ll get to my personal definition of that term in due course), it would have run its course over 20-some-odd issues and have left a legacy of a remarkable (I’m going to go out on a limb and add ‘brilliant’) and singular vision. With the replacement of Howard as artist on the series, First Comics and Howard declare themselves to be ‘business as usual’ and neither alternative nor independent.” 
Well, you know, I still think I was right about this. But I can certainly see how it would rub Howard the wrong way but -- as is usually the case with Dave Sim -- it’s more important to me to discuss openly what we think is “good for comics” and what we think is “bad for comics” because the improvement of the medium and the business context within which it exists is more important than who has or hasn’t got bruised feelings about what was or wasn’t said. 

I have no way of proving it, but I always suspected that the Black Kiss mini-series that Howard did for Vortex Publications in Toronto was directed at me, Howard at his most eloquent. “Is this what you meant, Dave? A small, prestigious project that will get talked about? Yes, this is the sort of thing I might’ve done through Aardvark One International if you hadn’t lit into me in print. So, instead, I’ve given it to one of your competitors, the guy just down the highway from you.” And then he called the collected version, Big Black Kiss. “And, see? You would’ve made money off of the collected version as well?” This was the reason that I called my 24-hour comic about a divorced wife (at this point Howard and I were both divorced from our wives) Bigger, Blacker Kiss. My reply to Howard being: there are larger issues at stake here which is why I wrote what I wrote about your choices on American Flagg! Larger issues that I think need to be discussed and need to have actual examples cited so that the next generation of cartoonists can make up their minds based on the two sides of the debate. The largest issue to me, now, would be, “How long has American Flagg! been out of print? How long has Big, Black Kiss been out of print?” Those questions are far larger than whether I did or didn’t get to publish them myself. 

by Howard Chaykin
(Vortex Comics, 1988-1989)

Anyway, I saw Howard at another convention a few years after this and made a bee-line for him. He was glad to see me. I was glad to see him. He said something flattering about the fact that I had figured out very quickly a few things it had taken him years to figure out which, braced as I was for a body shot, left me stammering in the other direction this time. It’s certainly something I would always say about Howard, too. Particularly Howard’s ability to encapsulate a huge argument in one pithy sentence. As you can see here, I just don’t have that aptitude. Howard not only had -- and has -- a very successful career in the ballbusting brutal confines of the New York City Funnybook Industry, he’s also had major successes in Hollywood career -- and not just as a storyboard artist or as a scriptwriter -- he’s actually risen to the executive level on the shows that he’s worked on, something which doesn’t happen unless you know your way around and have the ability to think fast and accurately on your feet in a pressure-cooker environment. Very, very rare qualities which Howard Chaykin has in spades. If Howard ever needed me for anything, he remains on a short list of people I would drop everything to help in any way that I could -- un-work related, I would assume. He’d be my first choice of someone to have dinner with in just about any comic-book context I could think of. And a big reason for that is that I would never have to wonder where I stood with Howard Chaykin. He would never say anything behind someone’s back that he wouldn’t say to that same person’s face. As was the case at the Aardvarks Over San Diego party. He had something to say and he said it. It cleared the air so that I didn’t hesitate for one second before approaching him the next time I saw him. 

Those are the sort of people I have always admired and whose company I have most enjoyed. 

I notice in the latest Overstreet Price Guide that all of the back issues of American Flagg! are priced at between 3 and 4 dollars, even Alan Moore’s run from 21 to 27. 

MWAH, Howard.

Weekly Update #147: Organising The Correspondence Archive


Dave gets his correspondence organized,
PLUS a sneak peak at Cerebus In Hell? #0
Coming soon to a comic book store near you!

Thursday, 8 September 2016

Cerebus In Hell? - Week 11

CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com
CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com
CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com
CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com
CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com
CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com
CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com

OFF WHITE HOUSE BULLETIN 1400 HRS 8 SEP 16

CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 ships 28th September 2016 (or there about!)
(Diamond Order Code: JUL161105)
Read CEREBUS IN HELL? daily at CerebusDownloads.com

DAVE SIM:
Very good news!  The purchase order for CEREBUS IN HELL? #0 came in this morning and it's for 8,021 copies.  Which is roughly two and a half times what the last issue of glamourpuss shipped.

As you can see from Travis Pelkie's query below, the comic-book field runs on an incredibly tight schedule:  we have the orders as of today and the book is scheduled to be in stores September 25.  If you read the fine print in your Marvel and DC comics you'll notice that they now run the print date of their books in the indicia -- and it's usually a week before it arrived in the comic stores.  Basically "keep up or quit".

This was a particular problem in our case because we had NO IDEA what the orders were going to be even as a ballpark -- if they would even be high enough to issue a purchase order -- so it's only as of today that we can get Marquis working on a quote.  Hopefully CIH?#0 can get booked at or close to the day GOING HOME ships (9/25) and they can print it shortly after that.  I've proofread the pages for the last time, Sandeep is e-mailing them to Sean for him to go over and then they go to Marquis to "join the line-up".  

The best news is that this means the CEREBUS IN HELL? mini-series is now a "go" (which was in doubt until we had the #0 numbers).  We're betting that the order drop-off from #1 to #4 on the mini-series can be kept to a minimal amount but still anticipating a substantial drop between #1 and #2 as an industry standard.

And we'll be able to go ahead with the pre-press MUCH faster with the mini-series than with #0, I think.  And (a big plus for us) the mini-series is DONE and has been since before we launched the online strip.  We want to get all the way through the mini-series (April of next year, God willing) before we decide what we're going to do next with CEREBUS IN HELL?  For the time being? Just keep producing the daily online strip while we mull it over.

Thanks to everyone who ordered at their LCS!  It won't be in stores by 9/25 but we will keep you posted every step of the way.

And now here's Margaret with the latest NOTEBOOKS entry!

Take it away, Margaret!

Wednesday, 7 September 2016

Beat the Hsiffies, buy bonds!

MARGARET LISS:
A few years ago I scanned all of Dave Sim's notebooks. He had filled 36 notebooks during the years he created the monthly Cerebus series, covering issues #20 to 300, plus the other side items -- like the Epic stories, posters and prints, convention speeches etc. A total of 3,281 notebook pages detailing his creative process. I never really got the time to study the notebooks when I had them. Just did a quick look, scanned them in and sent them back to Dave as soon as possible. So this regular column is a chance for me to look through those scans and highlight some of the more interesting pages.

Let's have another look at notebook #1, which covers issues #20 to 28. We saw it just a little over a month ago, when we saw the cover and page one. I was skimming through it, looking at the pages about to be sent out as a Cerebus Archive Five kickstarter reward and found a couple Captain Cockroach pages I thought were interesting.

We get a couple summaries of past issues, some Elrod dialogue (bottom right hand corner) and . . .is that a Captain Cockroach cover?

Notebook 1, page 25
Or perhaps just a sketch of splash page of issue #21 when Cerebus wakes up in Beduin not knowing how he got there, and running into Cockroach and Bunky. . .I mean, Elrod.

Then on page 28 we get another sketch of a splash page for issue #21 along with a start of the issue that wasn't to be - instead of Elrod tripping over Cerebus, Cerebus finds the pair.

Notebook 1, page 28


The Devil In the Details for Small Publishing-- ISBN, bar codes, matching fonts, and more



Sean Michael Robinson:

Greetings!

First off, a hearty thank-you to all the contributors to Cerebus Archive Number Five, which ended this weekend. If you haven't had a chance yet, take a look at Dave's posts from Friday for some thought-provoking discussion on how the archive project is evolving, and give some input, if you have the time!

Some good news — Going Home is currently on the schedule at Marquis, the files have been delivered, and it will most likely be shipping a little over two weeks from now, assuming there are no more bumps in the road. For those keeping track, this book has the highest percentage of original artwork of any book that's been restored so far, with about ten percent of the book sourced from photo negatives and only two pages total restored from print copies. I'm thrilled with the result and am eagerly awaiting delivery of my comp copies of the book...

For this week's post, I thought it might be interesting (or, more likely, useful) to take a look at some of the minutia that surround book publication, all of the tiny details that need to be attended to before sending a book out to the printer.

To the left you'll see a raw scan of my fourth-printing copy of Going Home, circa 2004. 

I'd say there are two basic approaches to putting together a design for which you no longer have original files or negatives to work with. One is essentially reconstruction, using the original design as a template and recreating the image from available sources. The second type is restoration, using only print images to make a workable file.

In the case of the Reads cover, I had every element that Dave and Gerhard had sent to the printer to construct the cover originally, every drawing, every photograph, every scrap-paper mockup with detailed instructions on the side, blue-line pencil indicating shading areas and percentage value and even screen numbers (lines per inch). 

With Going Home I have almost none of that. Just my print copy of the book, a scan of the hand-drawn logo for the front cover, a print copy of the first issue of Going Home which features the same image in a different cropping, and a scan of a match print of the cover of the book, sans spine info. 

The cover is based on a blowup of a slide by Gerhard taken "from my driveway at 'Camp Woolner', located out past Chicopee Ski Hill in Kitchener." Unfortunately, the original slide is MIA, so I had to restore the main image from a print copy (a detailed how-to post about that here).

But, that still leaves an awful lot of elements missing. Hence the scan to the left.

For a variety of reasons, I'll be better off finding matching fonts and redoing the rest of the cover text in my design program of choice. So how to find the fonts?

There are a few "free" services out there that will match fonts for you, or give you a list of likely subjects, based on uploaded images. And that's what I did here, using my favorite font service, Font Squirrel Matcherator. Upload the images, and in a few seconds you'll see a list of fonts with similar characteristics, along with download links. 

I used the scare quotes around "free" above because the service actually runs on referrals, taking a cut of linked font sales. In this case, though, once I had the identity of the font family, I was able to find a free and functional version of the font in question. Belwe Roman, designed by German typographer Georg Belwe way back in 1907 and thus firmly in the public domain.

(Want to make a Cerebus mockup of your own? Belwe Bold, 33 pt for the title and 14 pt for the author's names.)

As for the design element at the bottom of the page, George Gatsis had previously reworked this box from scratch, but I would need a new numeral. Another Font Squirrel search netted me the name of the second font family — Bodoni, once again, a historic face in the public domain. I found a workable free version (Libre Bodoni, appropriately) and matched the numeral at 22 pt.

Once I had my font information, it was time to drop it all in the layout program. Marquis' prepress department send me a mockup of the cover with the appropriate measurements, which I used to make a new Indesign document. I then dropped the flattened, restored image in, pulled down some blue-line guides to keep the text aligned, and then added all of the text elements. It took a bit to match the color of the logo and other text to my two print samples, but I finally settled on C0 M10 Y40 K0, or ten percent magenta and 40 percent yellow. 

And here's where that brings us —


Now all we're missing is the dreaded barcode!

ISBNs and barcodes are really, really large and really, really, boring topics. So rather than diving all the way into it here, let me just point out a few resources to you —

BookOW has a free barcode generator that packs in a lot more options than most. You can also manipulate and edit your barcode afterwards using your favorite image editor of choice, as long as you flatten it to a one-bit bitmap afterwards so it isn't halftoned when it's printed. There are also a lot of esoteric rules governing size of the barcode itself, specifically, its vertical height. You are of course welcome to memorize these — or, hey, you could borrow on the expertise of others by finding books with barcodes that you find unobtrusive and taking some measurements from those. 

Publishing a book that will be sold in a modern retail environment? Then you'll need an ISBN, which you can get here. In the case of Going Home, though, all I needed was ISBNsearch.org, and the new price of the book, which will also be included in the extended barcode.

And that, friends, is how it's done.


Of course, I'm missing the part where you agonize for half an hour, moving it back and forth and wondering how you'll ever find the perfect spot, what part of your glorious artwork will be covered by this abomination...

I only had to worry about this once, though. I sent Dave a fax of the High Society cover, with a potential placement and a host of other options. Should I put it up in the sky where there's white space? A little higher so it's aligned with the stairs? Back came the reply. "It's just covering some crosshatched stairs. There's more on the front." Or something to that effect.

Oh, right. This big ugly machine thing is on everything. It's ubiquitous. No one notices it anyway unless it's pointed out to them.

That's what I tell myself at night...

By the way, anyone notice anything about the two cover fonts, Belwe and Bodoni? Do the names give you any insight how they might ave been selected?

(Find any of this useful? Interesting? Let me know in the comments...)


Monday, 5 September 2016

"Don’t Do Comics. Comics Will Break Your Heart."

Jack Kirby (1992)
Photo by Susan Sakar 
THE ATLANTIC:
...The long battle between Kirby and Marvel had -- for now -- been laid to rest. While the details of the 2014 settlement between Marvel and the Kirby family are secret, it's likely -- given the amount Marvel stood to lose if the case went to trial -- that the terms were generous. But while Kirby's family may have finally gotten some measure of compensation, they are very much the exception....

...It's a well known fact in the comics industry and fandom that while superhero films make hundreds of millions at the box office, many creators of classic characters rarely see a dime for their work. They often have to rely on charity organizations like the Hero Initiative -- founded to help comic artists in financial need -- if they're alive, and they have little to leave to their families after they're dead. This is, of course, completely legal under current definitions of copyright law, regulations that have been repeatedly altered to help protect the corporations that hoard intellectual property. But it’s also the sort of thing the companies in question largely prefer not to talk about. Marvel's "Kirby Week" content all links to Kirby4Heroes, a program created by Kirby's granddaughter Jillian that raises money for the Hero Initiative while neglecting to discuss why such a program might need to exist.

All of which makes Marvel's celebration of "Kirby Week" so bittersweet. Kirby's vast legacy marches on. So, unfortunately, does its shadow: the long history of the industry using up artists and tossing them aside like so much crumpled paper. There’s a famous anecdote told by James Romberger, the artist of the graphic novel Seven Miles a Second. In the 1980s, Romberger met Kirby at a convention and showed him some of his work. "Kid, you’re one of the best," The King said, looking over the portfolio. "Don’t do comics. Comics will break your heart."

Jack Kirby

Sunday, 4 September 2016

Ernest Hemingway in Cerebus

Cerebus Vol 14: Form & Void (2001)
Art by Dave Sim & Gerhard
THE COMICS JOURNAL:
(from A History of Ernest Hemingway in Comics: Part 2 by Robert Elder, 2 September 2016)

Cerebus #251–265 (2000-2001)
Other literary luminaries, or their doppelgangers, have appeared in Dave Sim's 300-issue run of Cerebus, including Oscar Wilde, F. Scott Fitzgerald and Gertrude Stein.

The title character -- a humanoid aardvark who starts as a barbarian and becomes a prime minister, a pope, and finally, an outcast -- is the vehicle for Sim's exploration of philosophy, religion and gender politics.

In this story, "Form & Void", Cerebus treks home with his love, Jaka, and they encounter his idol, author "Ham Ernestway". This Hemingway avatar depicts the author at the end of his life, nearly subverbal as he fights a losing battle with depression. His icy wife Mary, always at his side, works to protect his legacy.

This spare story arc near the end of Cerebus' 300-issue run is part comic book, part obsessive notebook of Sim's Hemingway-related citations and tangents published at the back of each issue. The research Sim conducted for this arc is staggering, and he goes to great lengths to prove that Mary Hemingway kept a handwritten journal from her 1953 safari in Africa that’s since been lost or destroyed in favor of her typed and edited manuscript.

Sim's references rely heavily on Hemingway’s posthumously published The Garden of Eden and its depiction of gender ambiguity. On one page in Cerebus, an older Hemingway begins to disrobe, revealing women's lingerie.

The text quotes Hemingway: "Mary is a sort of prince of devils... She always wanted to be a boy and thinks as a boy without ever losing any femininity... She loves me to be her girl, which I love to be – not being absolutely stupid, and also loving to be her girl since I have other jobs in the daytime."
Sim goes farther than most scholars and biographers in claiming that Hemingway was bisexual.

"If all of the Garden of Eden manuscript pages were ever published, I'm sure Hemingway would become a de facto bi-sexuality poster boy," Sim says.

Below, a longer Q&A with Sim about Hemingway and Cerebus.

Q: What inspired you to put Hemingway in Cerebus?

A: I took Norman Mailer's word for it that Hemingway was the Undisputed Heavyweight Champion of the Literary World and decided that I would "do" him as the "capo di tutti capi" ["boss of all bosses"] literary presence in Cerebus -- all without having read of word of his fiction. If he's good enough for Mailer, he's good enough for me.

Q: Did Hemingway's writing have any impact on your work?

A: I'm a huge fan of the very early Hemingway, but ultimately decided that most of his work was "The Emperor's New Clothes". Not much "there" there. The lower-case in our time I would rate the highest [in our time was Hemingway's short story 1924 collection printed in Paris. His 1925 expanded edition, printed in New York, was upper-cased as In Our Time -- ed.]. Some parts of Men Without Women. I'd rate Fitzgerald and Mailer higher than I do Hemingway.

Q:  Even though you weren't a fan of Hemingway's work, what was your understanding of the author's popularity during his lifetime? What was his appeal?

A: The adventurer! All the frontiers would be explored in the course of Hemingway's lifetime and he was one of the last to travel to exotic locations and write about them and his choices were very astute: he made Kilimanjaro, bullfighting, the running of the bulls at Pamplona and the Spanish Civil War, among others, his own.

It must've been both a great joy and a great burden to be Hemingway, probably both simultaneously, and in a way that mixed very badly with atheism and alcohol. His "black ass" was largely self-inflicted, I think.

Q:  Scholars have linked Hemingway's "black ass" moods, as Hemingway himself put it, to his family's generational struggle with clinical depression and a legacy of suicide. Since you wrote the "Form & Void" story arc, how have your views on mental illness changed?

A: They haven't. We all go through periods of "black ass" in our lives and it's up to us to pull ourselves out of it. Hemingway didn't, which was a failure on his part. Period.

Q: In the end note for "Form & Void" and in "Tangent", you wrote that Mary Hemingway murdered her husband, and should be brought up on "first degree murder" charges. It's been some time since you wrote that -- was this hyperbole, or do you believe it to be true? Is the failure to prevent the last of several suicide attempts the same as murder?

A: The fact that she left the keys to the gun chest in plain sight suggests to me that she knew what she was doing and she knew what the result would be. So, it seems to me definitely premeditated. That having been said, it was Hemingway who unlocked the gun chest, loaded the weapon and pulled the trigger(s).

Q:  In 2012, you told the Comics Journal: "I think Hemingway was completely bi-sexual…" which is a bolder statement than his biographers have made. What you led to the conclusion that Hemingway was bi-sexual?

A: Two things: first, Mary Hemingway's Africa diary where it was clear that he was fantasizing that she was a young boy -- his "kitten brother"... Second, The Garden of Eden book which he wildly "over-wrote" to the tune of hundreds of pages trying to explain his sexuality in such a way as not to sound gay. He couldn't do it and gave up trying. If all of The Garden of Eden manuscript pages were ever published, I'm sure Hemingway would become a de facto bi-sexuality poster boy.

He wanted to be all man and all woman and he wanted his wives to be all man and all woman. Mary documented that in her journal, he snooped and read it and had to add his own entry after doing so, knowing that Mary's journal would be read, in order to "clarify" things for posterity. I think he thought that everyone was like that: all man and all woman and that he was the only one who was honest about it.

Robert Elder is the co-author of Hidden Hemingway.

Cerebus Archive Number 5 Kickstarted!


Congratulations to Dave Sim and Sandeep Atwal for raising CDN $30,805 with

Saturday, 3 September 2016

"That's Comics For You"

glamourpuss #1 (April 2008)
Art by Dave Sim
JEFF SEILER:
Sequentially reprinting Dave Sim's letters and faxed correspondence to me, with occasional annotations from me.

This next letter comes in response, in a roundabout way, to a fax that Craig Johnson had sent to Dave about promoting glamourpuss in the early going.

14 July, 2008

Hi Jeff:

Please tell Craig I appreciate his forbearance, since baby steps are the order of the day right now. I’m a little too alert at the moment, since the interim between orders on the second issue and the third issue is getting to the "make or break" point and there's very little that I can do about it -- once a book has been launched all you can do is keep writing and drawing it and trying to keep on schedule. The idea of volunteers posting artwork at comics websites is really just a "Hail Mary" pass at this point and, unfortunately, nothing that I can monitor myself. If there were a fallback position, I could afford to be philosophical, but there isn't one.

For all I know, glamourpuss is already dead because no one likes it but they’re too polite to say so, but "not volunteering" is pointing in that direction. I don't know. 16,000 on the first issue, structurally, isn’t "escape velocity" given that the retailers are going to cut their orders in half on each subsequent issue. 16,000; 8,000; 4,000; 2,000; 1,000. You can put check marks next to one and two already. All I can do is to try to drum up interest at the consumer level and I don't think it’s possible to do that -- on the Internet or elsewhere -- but you have to at least TRY.

Oh, well. I'll know by the end of August (or October at the latest).

Anyway, maybe you could relay that as an explanation of the sense of urgency attached to this. Either things get turned around in the next three months or the outcome is pretty certain.

Imagine working at a job where you know that each month that you work there, your income is going to be cut in half, so that you pretty well know the exact point where you're going to have to quit. That's comics for you.

Best,

Dave