Lithograph No. 1: Neil Gaiman
DAVE SIM:(from The Long, Strange History of Phase II, 2004)
...The four images of
Neil-the-starving-journalist overlap the principle image of Neil and make
for a more-than-somewhat ridiculous composition. It is the author of
Sandman, or -- perhaps more relevant to the subject -- the New York
Times bestselling author of American Gods (the principle image
having been adapted from that novel’s dust jacket photo) with four little
starving journalists stuck onto him. I’m actually quite pleased with the
way it worked out: If you are close enough to see what it is made up of,
it’s actually quite dignified: Neil, as I first met him -- who was certainly
a most distinguished-looking individual as starving journalists go -- framed
in a tight photorealistic illustrative composition of the
four-times-repeated image coupled with Neil Gaiman, the best-selling
author he would become. But if you take a step back it becomes
ridiculous. Neil is wearing himself like a pair of Mickey Mouse
ears. The point that I’m trying to make is that this always needs to
be factored into my thinking about Neil: I always have to observe closely
in order to perceive accurately. The size of the starving journalist
relative to the best-selling author he has become is critically important
to accurate perception: the increase in stature is in no way
exaggerated. In my most accurate assessment these images here
are as big as he was then and that image there is as big as he is
now. There was, to me, an intrinsic necessity in depicting -- through
the repeated image -- the multiple aspects of the starving journalist I met:
Neil, Dave Dickson's friend and journalistic peer; Neil, Roz Kaveney’s
literary protégé; Neil, the inquiring graphic novelist in utero;
Neil, the Cerebus fan. These are aspects of Neil Gaiman that I
was privy to, however briefly, that his legions of admirers are not. In
any conventional sense, that can’t -- nor, in my view, should -- be
discarded But in this instance, as a result of knowing
"pre-Neil", distance not only doesn't imply overview, it results in an
opposite effect. Whenever I see Neil I can never "not see" the sort
of nerdy young fellow that I first met. As on the occasions when
Neil would say to me, "I'm so proud of you." And I would -- very much
amused -- correct him: "No, Neil. I was in the business before you were.
I’m proud of you."
And it's quite true. I am proud of Neil, proud of
the graphic novelist who was the first person besides myself and Gerhard
to attempt a marathon graphic novel, proud of his commercial success and
proud of -- and what is more a direct beneficiary of -- his status as a
breakthrough person who has served to legitimize the comic-book medium
both by his triumph with Sandman and by his success in the world of
television drama, short stories and novels which have led so many people
TO Sandman and through Sandman TO the comic-book
medium.
Even though when I look at him from any distance, I
see these little starving journalists sticking out of him.
No comments:
Post a Comment