This Week's Auction is at $10 (US).
You should order the Vark Wars.
|
____________________________________
As I prepare to do the September 2019 Please Hold for Dave Sim (send your questions to momentofcerebus@gmail.com) I thought I'd catch up on the Please Hold transcripts made by
Jesse Lee Herndon! Thanks Jesse! |
Dave:
Okay. Uhh, I guess we will start with Barry Deutsch.
Matt:
Okay.
Dave: I
pulled out the Hereville book, cause I hadn’t seen one of those in a while, and
checked the dates on them. The first one came out 2010, the second one 2012,
the third one 2015, and definitely not my kind of theology, but very very
accomplished work, so I’m hoping Barry’s been able to keep going with
Hereville.
Matt: Uhh,
yeah, I dunno.
Dave:
Anyway, it gives you an excuse to put some Hereville book covers up on the site
when you’re looking for visuals for “Please Hold for Dave Sim.”
Matt:
Yeah…
Dave: So,
his question about, “anyone know if Dave and company plan to do more Cerebus
Archive Portfolios? There weren’t many in 2018.” One of the problems that I’m
having, pretty much across the board right now, is pretty much the price of
paper. So it’s very difficult to figure out what’s the best way to be trying to
make money in 2019 with the paper prices doing what they’re doing. In terms of
the Cerebus Archive Portfolios, I had settled into 10 pages of artwork and 3
pages of commentary, 3 sheets of commentary, 6 pages of commentary, in each of
the portfolios and I don’t know if that’s viable, and I haven’t been able to
figure out what is it that I’m going to have to cut if I have to cut something.
Do I cut the 10 pages back to 8 pages? And do I cut the commentary back from 3
sheets, 6 pages, to 2 sheets, 4 pages, or 1 sheet, 2 pages? It’s a very time
consuming process to write the commentaries and it tends to take up pretty much
an entire 12 hours a day, 6 days a week work week, when I do it. I do have the
pages for Cerebus Archive #8 pulled out, the 10 earliest pages from the Cerebus
Archive, and it’s also a situation where it’s stuff that interests me, but it’s
not stuff that I think would interest the general Cerebus audience, if there
even is such a thing anymore.
Matt:
[laughs]
Dave: The
first page that I’ve got, issue 164, page3 is I think the earliest?… No, it’s
not. That’s the other thing I was doing, was starting to shuffle them around,
going, maybe if I deal with these not in the order that they were… I got two
Elrod pages where he’s the sidekick for the Punisheroach, and those are
interesting. I was looking forward to doing that. Then we get into a bit of a
problem area because there’s 3 pages… let me count here, 1, 2… 3… no, 4 pages
of the Oprah Winfrey parody, and I don’t know if 25 years later on, we’re any
more ready for an Oprah Winfrey parody than we were in 1992.
Matt:
[laughs] I always thought they were funny.
Dave:
[laughs] Well, okay, that’s you and me so far.
Matt: I
remember at SPACE one year, the year that when Seiler was still dating the
crazy Canadian, cause she was there. We had enough women that we could do that
sequence and not have Margaret do all the voices, and we did it… everybody in
the room was laughin’. I dunno if anybody watched the video, I think it’s on
Youtube.
Dave:
Okay. Um, it’s just a very weird situation, just when you asked me about it,
and it’s like, I went, “Okay, the pages are sitting right here.” I’ve got them
sitting in the doorway of the office. So, they’re right there every time I come
in and go out, and, you had relayed Barry’s question about whether there’s
gonna be another Cerebus Archive, and it just seemed really coincidental, but
at the same time, that I went, “Okay, let’s look at the pages again”. And I got
to the Oprah Winfrey pages and there was like 4 of them. And I went, “Mmm, I
don’t think anybody’s gonna buy 4 pages of Oprah Winfrey parody”, and then I
went, “Uhh, okay, maybe don’t take Oprah Winfrey as seriously as they used to.”
And then that very day, like, I’m reading the “Leaving Neverland” review in the
National Post and they’ve got Oprah Winfrey, as our… what was it the New York
Times called it? Processor in Chief, who did this one hour old style Oprah
Winfrey kind of [gate??] with these survivors of Michael Jackson. And I’m
sitting there going, “Oprah Winfrey was like one of the world’s biggest Michael
Jackson boosters. What is she doing being our Processor in Chief? The person
who is going to help us all get a handle on this triggering Michael Jackson
moment? “ It’s like, I think… this is where I’m starting to get into dangerous
territory just talking about talking about talking about Oprah Winfrey, where it’s
like, I think most guys back in the 1990s had a pretty good idea of who Michael
Jackson was? I don’t think the women did, and I think probably black people had
a very kind of blind spot for Michael Jackson, but when the stories first
started surfacing of him molesting prepubescent boys. It’s like, well whatever
he’s doing to make his voice go like that, his voice doesn’t naturally go like
that, that seems to dovetail with it and the whole Peter Pan thing. It’s like,
wasn’t there a consensus that Michael Jackson was crazy?
Matt:
[laughs] Yeah, yeah. I remember a couple of years back, talking to somebody
when he was still alive, when he was going to trial… or they were investigating
him, and somebody was like “Oh yeah, I was a big Michael Jackson fan” and I’m
like, “Really? Cause he hasn’t had a hit since like 1990”. I mean, I remember
he had one album come out after Thriller that was huge, and then there was one
more, and then it was like he fell off the radar screen and all you ever heard
about was the scandal. And I’m like, “Where’s the fanbase for this?”
Dave:
Yeah.
Matt: Ya
know, it’s not like he’s producing album after album, we’re not hearing from
Michael other than Michael’s weird and crazy.
Dave:
Yeah… yeah. It seemed to be a drug thing, as well, whatever painkillers he got
into when he set his hair on fire during the Pepsi commercial. It’s like, he
seemed right to go to the Elvis Presley drug plan thing of “I’m Michael Jackson
and I can afford to buy and sell doctors 8 times over. So why don’t you just
give me prescriptions that I want?” And it’s like self-medicating on this
absolutely mind-boggling level.
Matt:
Well, that’s…I remember after he died Lisa Marie came out with, when they were
married that was his biggest fear was that he was gonna end up like Elvis, and
I’m like, “Really? Cause sounds like you went, “Yeah I can do that!””.
Dave:
Yeah! It looked more like a lifestyle choice than a cautionary tale from his
point of view. The other thing, looking at the… I’m just paging through the
Oprah Winfrey parody, and I did Cat Yronwode as Doctor Ironcat. Do you remember
Cat Yronwode? Or do you know the reference to Cat Yronwode?
Matt: I
have the original issues of Miracleman, so I get some of the reference. I mean,
I know who she is.
Dave:
Right. Yeah, cause she was an odd sort of character where she got romantically
involved with Dean Mullany at Eclipse and just basically became the Eclipse
publisher. The only time I heard from Dean Mullany in the last 25 years he
referred to her as “she who must not be named”.
Matt:
[laughs]
Dave: And
that was another thing where I’m going, “Okay, first of all, am I taking my
life in my hands describing what I see when I look at Oprah Winfrey? Then am I
taking my life in my hands explaining how exactly strange I thought Cat
Yronwode was?” Who, when Eclipse went out of business, she just sort of seemed
to vanish. I knew mostly of her because I subscribed to the Comics Buyer’s
Guide and she had a column in there called “Fit to Print”. She was the one that
came up with “Bunny and Tree” as Will Eisner had told her anybody can do a
comic strip. So she took him at his word and did a comic strip called “Bunny
and Tree” and that’s where the Elrod bunnies and the Cerebus trees came from in
“High Society”. And I gotta say, between trying to explain what I see when I
look at Oprah Winfrey and what I see when I look at Cat Yronwode, and trying to
do it in less pages than I’ve had in the commentaries up until now, I really
can’t see myself making any friends this way.
Matt:
[laughs]
Dave:
Particularly, the really hardened feminists like Barry Deutsch. I’m perfectly
happy to be honest. I mean, I try to be as honest as possible about everything
that I do, and if I’m doing commentaries, well, I’ll be honest about whatever
it is that I’m supposed to be talking about. But feminists are not real big on
any kind of honesty besides feminist honesty, in my experience. They expect you
to tow the line, and if you don’t, you have to be fully prepared to being
destroyed for not being a feminist.
Matt:
Yeah.
Dave:
[laughs]
Matt:
[laughs] There’s a couple of women I work with that, ya know, years ago when I
first started working at a factory, and okay, I’m working with a woman… there’s
was like two or three women I work with, but not at the same time. And then it
was, okay, there’s two women working together, and they’re the best of friends.
And then a third woman started so then it’s… if you’re workin’ with three
women, it’s two of them are the best of friends, and one of them is always
gonna be “that bitch”. And I’ve told people this, and they just look at me like
I’m insane, and I’m like, “watch”, and invariably, okay, I’m working with these
two girls and they’re the best of friends. Yes, they’re a little catty to each
other, but, ya know, they laugh and they giggle. And then a new girl starts and
immediately one of them becomes “that bitch”, that, ya know, the other two just
can’t stand. And I’ve had guys I’ve explained this to go, “No, you’re
completely wrong, Matt.” And a week later they come back with, “Wow, you’re
right, she is ‘that bitch’!” And I shake my head cause it’s like, I’ve seen it
happen over and over again.
Dave: This
was a guy that told you this?
Matt: I
told this to a guy, and he didn’t believe me, and then a week later he came
back and went, “yeah, no, you’re right.” If you don’t toe the company line,
when it comes to women and how they, ya know, they have their hierarchy and if
you buck the trends, all of a sudden, you’re out.
Dave:
Yeah, that’s sort of related to what I call the Queen Bee Syndrome. Where
somebody is going to be the arbiter of who is who and what’s what, and as soon
as she makes herself apparent as the Queen Bee you have two choices -- get on
her good side by letting her do whatever she wants to whoever she wants
whenever she wants, or probably lose your job or whatever context it is that
you’re in, because nobody crosses the Queen Bee.
Matt:
Yeah, the way I always look at it is, tow the company line or hide.
Dave: [laughs]
Right, right. So that’s really what I’ve been going through on the Cerebus
Archive portfolio #8. Issue 163 page 6 is in there, and that’s the Asian
prostitute with Punisheroach, and it’s like, that became a whole can of worms,
cause I’m looking at it and I’m going, “Okay, I know where that came from in my
personal life at the time, and again, I’m perfectly amenable to explaining
where any of the jokes or situations come from.” What was interesting was
looking at it, going, “This is pre-Chester Brown prostitution.” Which then led
to, do I want to talk about that as well? Like, when I was hanging around with
Chester Brown and listening to him, his advocacy of prostitution, which… we
just kept going around the same circle all the time. Believe me, Chester, ya
know, I’m not an impoverish individual, if I thought there was nothing wrong
with paying young girls for sex, [laughs] I would be right there with you. It’s
like, man oh man, just as mental pictured experiences go, yeah, physical
pleasure, prosthetic feedback, whatever you want to call it. But, the morality
of it is just, you can’t do that. There’s no way to make that a moral choice,
it just seemed completely self-evident to me. Although, I live in a country
where, as I’m saying to somebody the other day, prostitution is, at least for a
time, has been seen as a civic virtue. This is a very good thing for a young
girl to get into, because it gives her independence and autonomy, and she’s
able to make lots of money. I don’t know if that’s still the point of view,
that stuff tends to change behind the scenes, depending on what the Queen Bees
are deciding between each other what’s okay and what’s not okay. That’s one of
those, “do I really want to get into this?” and “Do I really want to get into
this just after explaining what I see when I look at Oprah Winfrey and Cat
Yronwode?”
Matt:
[laughs] That’s your minefield, not mine. [laughs]
Dave:
Well, exactly, it’s like, I was the one who decided to do a whole book called
“Women” and being as honest as I possibly could in it with the women characters
that I was doing. Here is my experience with women, what women are like in my
experience. I’ve had good experience and I’ve had bad experiences, but mostly I
look at it as I don’t think this is exportable into the political world and the
business world without really doing serious damage to both, but I’m one of the
few people who’s actually willing to say that out loud. I don’t know, it seems
very weird, people seem to be backing towards my position? But everyone seems
to be more willing to say, “Oh this whole political correctness thing is just
getting out of control. We need a lot fewer people forcing people to be
politically correct.” But they won’t say the same thing about feminists. It’s
like, you need the firewall euphemism of political correctness. We can’t say,
“No, this is what women have done to society over the last, well, next year
will be the 50th anniversary.”
Matt:
Right. That’s… again, that’s your minefield! [laughs]
Dave:
Well, there ya go. So, I guess the short answer for Barry is, this is what
keeps happening when it comes time to do Cerebus Archive #8, is well, okay, if
I sit down to talk about this, as I always do, I will actually talk about this
and I don’t know if you’re allowed to talk about this in our society. How many
more Cerebus Archive customers I will lose by actually talking about Oprah
Winfrey and actually talking about Cat Yronwode and actually talking about the
whole Asian prostitute situation?
Matt: I
mean, you could write everything up and we could put it online and put it in
the notes, “Here’s the website if you want way more information than the
average Cerebus fan”, but then again, then you’re getting to, well, here’s the
commentary, and the commentary is go over there and look and we’re gonna wait
here, and you can come back, if you want.”
Dave:
Yeah, uhh… I’m not sure [laughs] over elaboration is going to help the
situation, either. It’s like… no, this was already irritating me, I don’t want
to go online and get more irritated.
Matt:
Right.
Dave: … by
reading. Although, that’s definitely what we’re planning on doing with the
Strange Death of Alex Raymond, is to have online annotations, so that I’m not
limited to, “well, it has to fit in the back of…”
STUNNING CLIFFHANGER
TO BE CONTINUED IN SON OF PART 1
PART 2
Dave:
That’s a work in progress, and that sort of dovetails with another thing here
of your “Dave Sim effed up” thing. And actually, I just had that happened, two
weeks ago? Three weeks ago? I faxed Eddie Khanna my commentaries on Strange
Death of Alex Raymond. I can usually get about 4 or 5 pages done a day, and I
did do a commentary on “The Caged Songbird” storyline and made a major mistake
of, I had transcribed something from the storyline that… I think I was talking
to you about last time, that Ward Greene, when he was putting in
autobiographical things would use two-dot ellipses beause that’s Morse code for
“I”.
Matt:
Right.
Dave: And
I was going through the list of those, and I had one where I thought he had
written “Mr Dorff” instead of “Mr Van Dorff” and was making a point of why I
thought this was autobiographical that he left out the Van, and then it turned
out that, no, I transcribed it incorrectly, I went back and checked in the
collected book and there it was. It said “Van Dorff”, which was really strange
because the Heritage Auctions catalogue came in that day, and it had the
original artwork for that strip in the back, which is one of those weird comic
art metaphysics moments. So, what I told Eddie is anytime there is a mistake
like that, we want to lead with that. Whatever section those commentaries go
in, that goes up at the top, saying, “this was a mistake that Dave Sim made.”
And not correcting the mistake, because it hasn’t actually gone out there. So
if I’ve actually typed it into the commentary, then I think there’s a level of
dishonesty to fixing the mistake as if it were never there, or just letting it
be buried somewhere in the text and let’s see if anybody notices. No, if I make
a mistake, I definitely want the mistake highlighted and headlined, because I
think one of the things is there are going to be mistakes. I don’t think any
human being can do a mistake free creative work. It’s made-up stuff.
Matt:
Right.
Dave: If
you’re making stuff up, then the odds are that you’re going to be able to
flawlessly make stuff up seems really, really so unlikely as to be completely
over into the impossible, and I don’t think I’ve ever claimed that Cerebus was
a flawless work, or even a work with few flaws in it. Like, I think, the text
in itself is what we really have in scripture, that’s the flawless text in
terms of witness and testimony. This is why it exists is to keep the record
straight of, “okay, this is how everything’s happened.” That’s my
interpretation of it. And it took a long time, it took centuries and centuries
for anybody to even consider creating text that wasn’t scriptural. [laughs] I
think exactly the reason we’ve that we see in our society. If you just let
people write whatever they want to write, you get over into really, really
dangerous areas very very quickly, and before you know it, scripture has been
completely elbowed out of the way in favor of stuff that people wanted to make
up. So, I’m always… like I keep those things completely separate in my life.
There’s scripture, and then there’s commentary. I comment on scripture, and
then there’s made-up stuff. And it’s like, I’m pretty careful to know the
difference on that. I don’t talk about books that I’ve read as if they’re in
the same category as the Bible. The Bible is the Bible. Commentary on the Bible
is what it is, and made-up stuff is what made-up stuff is, and that sort of
dovetails into… we’re talking about the commentaries on the Genesis question.
Matt:
Right.
Dave: That
it just runs out in the middle of February, and it’s definitely done. That was
Doctor Troy in Texas, my major patron on the 2012 Kickstarter where we offered
$10,000 and Dave Sim will come and stay at your house and do a picture on your
wall. Doctor Troy went for it and didn’t want me to do a picture on his wall,
but he did want to videotape me talking to his Minister, who was John Burke at
the time, and that was a situation where I was happy to do that. His Minister,
John Burke, gave me a copy of his book, “Soul Revolution”, and I read that and
then, figuring, well, okay, $10,000 is a lot of money. $10,000 US, so I will
comment on “Soul Revolution” and send my commentaries on Reverend Burke’s book
to Reverend Burke and to Doctor Troy, and never heard back from either of them.
That was one of my Sabbath observances, every Sunday I would write about 5 or 6
pages of commentary, and then Doctor Troy sent me the “Genesis Question” book
in 2013, and it’s like, “well, okay, I guess I’ll comment on this.” Mostly
making the point why YHWH and God can be the same being, and this is a
recurring motif in any of the scriptural commentaries that I do. So I did the
scriptural commentaries on the “Genesis Question” and “Soul Revolution”
2012/2013/2014/2015. And then, in the middle of writing all of that, that was
when my wrist went [??], so I didn’t know if that was, “Okay, I’m not supposed
to be doing this. I didn’t know why I’m not supposed to be doing this, but if
Doctor Troy’s gonna send me the book in the mail and I’m gonna read it, and then
I’m gonna comment on it.” So, basically, I just stopped doing it. But that’s
one of those, I do write commentaries because the Bible comes up reasonably
often in the course of Rip Kirby. Ward Greene definitely had a background in
the Bible and theology. He went completely over to the other side, over to the
dark occult side, as far as I can see, but he did have a background in it, so
his references are very specific. But me commenting on the Bible, commenting on
what I see here, and going into considerable depth of using Strong’s
Concordance to figure out, okay, what is the actual Hebrew term here and where
does it come from, and what are the 10 or 12 different meanings that I can
have? Which could definitely change what is the traditional translation of it,
to, okay I think this is probably a more accurate translation, because there’s
an androgynous female connotation to the term that I think is the reason why
YHWH is using that term, because YHWH to me, is he/she/it. To which, ya know,
LGBTQ on a different level, and that’s planet Earth, that’s what we’re reading
when we’re reading, “The Lord says” and the Lord tells the Hebrew people to do
this. So, I do that, but I also spend a considerable amount of time just
reading scripture aloud, because what I see in scripture and how I interpret
scripture to me is on a much much much much lower level than just reading
scripture aloud from the Bible, from the Koran, from my English translation of
the Koran, or my interlinear [??] scriptures. I think scripture is really all
that we’ve got and that’s why I avoid going over into the scripture thing. I
mean, scripture commentary exclusively, thing. The thing that drives me crazy
about the Church Sermon is the priest and minister wants to talk for 15 minutes
about something that happened to him this week, and then, will touch on a verse
of scripture. It’s like, I really think scripture is a lot more important than
what happened to you when you were sitting stuck in traffic for a couple of
hours last Tuesday and this funny thing happened. It’s like, why don’t you know
the difference? [laughs] Why don’t you know that scripture is on this elevated
level and what you have to say about it is way down here? So, it’s interesting
that all of this has sort of interconnected in this weird way. That tends to
happen, as well.
Matt:
That’s something I thought about the other day was, with the Strange Death of
Alex Raymond, that… I know you’re doing a lot of research and it’s this
never-ending rabbit hole of, ya know, you found something, you went for more
information about it, and then that leads to something else, which leads to
something else, which leads to something else. And I’m like, “ I wonder if this
is gonna turn into this giant holistic thing where it’s all interconnected?”
Dave:
Well, I think it is! I think see it as God’s immaculate clockwork mechanism.
It’s just an imaginably large clock, we’re enacting things, over and over
again, and the more you gravitate to scripture and the more that you focus on
scripture, the thing of reading scripture aloud so it’s coming out of your
mouth, it’s going in yours ears, it’s coming in your eyes, it’s circulating in
your brain. That’s the closest you can get to God’s clockwork mechanism, as
opposed to, ya know, watching “The 10 Commandments” with Charlton Heston, or
something like that. One is actually part of the clockwork mechanism, and the
other is somebody who doesn’t know how to build a watch, going, “That looks
like fun, I want to do that.” Yeah, it all does seem to be interconnected and
you just get glimmerings of it. You see, “wow this actually is linked to. This
actually is connected to that.” Particularly when I’m doing the commentaries,
because if I’m doing Alex Raymond commentaries I have to explain it on paper…
well, not on paper, but on a word processor, explaining it exactly the way that
I see it, which involves writing it all out and then going back to the
beginning and reading through and going, “Okay, I’m not explaining this to
myself thoroughly enough for me to understand it, so I don’t think anybody else
is going to understand it.” And I have to find sharper and sharper ways to
explain what it is that I think that I’m seeing here. And, it does seem to me
like the best use of my time, but at the same time, you gotta go, “well, you
also got to figure out a way to make a living here. You’ve got to bring in
money on this.”
3 END
4 BEGIN
Dave: You
gotta bring in money on this. And that becomes the problem. That’s one of the
things that’s going on with the Kickstarters is… I dunno, we might just have to
leave the restorations, the remastering of the books alone because the books
are just not selling well enough for Diamond to warrant that. The only thing
they’re selling is Cerebus In Hell?, so try and find, okay, what’s a way to
bring in money not just doing the Cerebus In Hell? comic book? Let’s do this
postcard, we can do a postcard everything two months, maybe they’ll be enough
money coming in so that the four of us can buy groceries, at least. And we’ll
see, this time next week, we’ll have a much clearer answer of, “okay, this is
how much money came in” and then the week after that, “this is how much money
it costs to do the postcard”, “this is how much money was left over when we
divided it four ways”, “this is how much money each guy made.”
Matt:
Well, that’s… one of the things with Cerebus In Hell? people have mentioned is,
they’ll go to their comic book store and they’re like, “Oh yeah! There’s that
new Cerebus book” and they go and they look in the C’s and they don’t find it
because Watchvark is under W for Watchvark, and Nick Calm is under N for Nick
Calm. I dunno if I faxed you, but I mentioned something to Sean and Ben and
David of, if you guys title the book “Cerebus in Hell presents” whatever the
one shot is, then they’d always get racked under C for Cerebus and maybe people
could find it easier and maybe sales would go up. But that’s one of those… ya
know, it’s an intangible that there’s no control group of, well, is it gonna
help or not?
Dave:
Right. There’s also the fact that it’s pin-balling between 1900 and 2100
copies, so I’m inclined to believe the retailers are finally finding the
bottom. This is exactly how many of these that we need. One of the problems is
that, with Cerebus, they always went up after issue 5 and issue 6, which then
made it sensible to do a collection in order to catch people up on the
storyline. That’s not happening with Cerebus In Hell? So it seems a lot more
sensible to just have people figure out, okay here they all are on the back
cover, here’s all their Diamond order codes, I just have to go into the store
and say, “I want this one, this one, this one, this one, this one, and this
one.” And then buy the other ones online, and that’s the 1900 people taken care
of.
Matt:
Right.
Dave: You
don’t want to be forcing the 1900 people to buy the same four comics they’ve
already bought when they’ve already got those comic books.
Matt:
Right. I know for Ben Hobbs’ column he was doin’ the 2019 checklist, and then
he did the revised checklist, and then he did the revised revised checklist,
and the joke the next week, cause on Tuesdays I’ll say, “next time, Ben Hobbs”
and whatever. [laughs] That week, it was “next time, Ben Hobbs and the revised
revised revised 2019 checklist?” Cause it seemed like it was changin’ every
week, and I could tell, just reading what Ben was writing, that it was one of
those, “Yeah, we decided not to do that, now we’re gonna do this.” I mean, I
can see not doin’ a collection if the numbers aren’t there, cause, why waste…
it’s gonna cost how much to print, versus how many one-shots could you print
for the same amount?
Dave: I
mean, this brings me all the way back to when I was doing “Swords of Cerebus”
and I was getting hate mail from people because I put a backup story in it.
It’s like, now I have to buy these four comic books that I already own just to
get the backup story. And it’s like, yeah, I can see that too, but I also see
it as as here’s more Cerebus. I can’t do two monthly titles, but if I’ve got a
trade paperback coming out and I work with somebody else, I can maybe do
another 8 page story. It’s like… [laughs] Can I get a round of applause for
productivity? And it’s like, “No.” [laughs] What you get is hate mail for
forcing me to buy something that I already own.
Matt: It’s
the Catch-22 of, ya know, “Hey! I’m gonna collect everything, but I’m gonna
give ya a little somethin’ extra.” “Well, I don’t want somethin’ extra.” “Well,
wait until 1995 and buy the World Tour Book.”
Dave:
Right. Yeah I’m still thinking about a Cerebus in Hell? trade paperback, and I
was going, “how do you avoid that?” and I was thinking if you did the old
science fiction annual thing of just putting the covers on the front cover and
the interiors are on the interior, so there’s absolutely nothing in here that
if you have these four issues you don’t already have, so you don’t have to buy
them.
Matt:
Right. I mean, that’s one way.
Dave: Then
I’d probably get hate mail, saying “Well, couldn’t you put some more strips in
here?”
Matt:
[laughs] I believe somebody commented on it when it was still on the schedule
was, “so instead of paying $4 an issue for 4 issues, I can pay $25 for 4
issues… ya know, I’m not savin’ any money.” It’s one of those, “yeah, but it’s
gonna cost this much to collect these four issues. Ya know, the cost of paper,
the cost of printing, it’s tied together, ya know.” It would be nice if you
guys made a little money on the deal, too.
Dave: How
are comic books priced now? Are they still $3.99.
Matt:
Yeah, for most of ‘em. Far as I know, I don’t think they’ve dropped the price.
I know there was talk of droppin’ prices, but I haven’t been to comic shop in a
couple months, so I’m not sure.
Dave:
Okay. How long have comic books been $3.99? Do you have a memory of that?
Matt: Uhh…
I remember DC did a big thing where they did their New 52 which I think was
like 5 years ago? Where they were “holding the line at $2.99”, and uhh… lemme
see when that was…
Dave:
That’s one of the questions of, “I have to admit I have a big mental block
against going to $4.50” or something like that, on Cerebus in Hell? It’s like
$4 seems like above the maximum that you can do. That’s why I wonder, are we
ready for the $5 comic book?
Matt: I
don’t think so…
Dave:
Cause it seems to me that they did sort of jump from $3 to $4. Like there’s
territory in between there. But it does seem odd to even talk about, “well
okay, do we do a $3.25 comic? Or do we do a $3.50 comic? Or do we do a $3.33
comic?”
Matt: I
know that that was the thing in the 90s that Marvel was doin’, increasing it
like a quarter every time there was an increase. Once they hit $2 they jumped
up.
Dave:
Okay, the other thing that you were commenting on, in over 40 years you’re the
only person who has noticed it, is the Cerebus silhouette thing.
Matt:
[laughs] I only noticed it because I read the first three issues and I was
like, they all have that same ending and I’m like, I wonder how issue 4 ends?
And I got to that one and I’m like, “Okay, that’s… something that I just
noticed.”
Dave: That
was square one. That was the first panel in the first issue of Cerebus, Cerebus
is a tiny silhouette, you can’t even tell where he stops and where the horse
begins. So, it was always going back to square one, panel one, in the early
stories, cause I didn’t know how many of these I was going to be able to do,
and this was certainly my experience was, it didn’t matter what I did, I was
always back at square one.
Matt:
[laughs]
Dave:
Which, was why I called 112/113, “Square One.”
Matt:
Okay, that makes sense.
Dave:
Cause it was definitely the sense that I had, and remember I was a complete
atheist at the time, why is this? Why are there people like me who are always
getting sent back to square one, and there are all these other people where
they have a success and just a giant vista of success opens up in front of
them? Like, how does that work?
Matt:
Right…
Dave: And
from my perspective now… well, not strictly from my perspective now, but
certainly after I became religious I looked back at it and went, “no, this was
a saving grace in your life that you didn’t have that kind of success, because
there are more unhappy stories attached to that kind of success than there are
happy stories attached to that kind of success.” That’s really one of those,
there but for the grace of God go I. Before I became religious, I did have
intimations of it, though. I did… when Image came along they had this
absolutely unimaginably explosive success and out of the 7 guys, the one guy
who was actually doing what I was doing, which was producing his book, was
Larsen on Savage Dragon.
Matt:
Right.
Dave:
Everybody else went the whole Hollywood route, and I think that was a sort of
an after the fact explanation of, well, this is why your life had to go and had
to go the way that it’s going, because you would have gone off in this
direction. As attractive as that looks, the big pile of money and the giant
commercial success definitely has its own gravitational pull, and that pulls
you away from what’s actually important to you. Talking to Kevin Eastman the
last time when I talked to him on the phone, and that’s definitely been his
experience. He’s much much happier now just being a guy who draws comics, draws
turtle comics, than he ever was being the multimillionaire creator of the
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, the CEO of Turtles, Inc. And it’s interesting to
have those kinds of wheels turn around in that way, where what I had already
suspected I get confirmed for me from the guy who actually went through it.
Matt:
Right. I can see that.
Dave: Okay,
well, that just about uses up our hour. I’m afraid I did a lot more of the
talking this time than you did.
Matt:
Yeah, but it’s “Please Hold for Dave Sim”, not “Please Hold for Matt Dow”, so
it’s fine by me.
Dave:
Okay, alright. Try not to leave off on a down note or a somber note, I was
talking to Bob Burden a couple of weeks back, and he had, what I consider a
very funny suggestion, which was Donald Trump should make Bernie Sanders the
American ambassador to Venezuela so he can see what an actual socialist country
looks like.
Matt:
[laughs] Yeah… [laughs] It’s a suggestion, but I don’t think it’s gonna happen,
but it’s a suggestion… [laughs]
Dave: I
would definitely like to be a fly on the wall if that happened, anyway.
Matt:
[laughs] I would like to hear the tape the fly on the wall made of that
conversation when it happens, but I don’t think I’d actually want to be on the
wall.
Dave:
[laughs] There ya go. Okay, well, that does it for another month again, Matt.
Matt:
Okay! Thanks.
Dave:
Alright.
Matt: Talk
to you again next month.
Dave: I’ll
talk to you again. Say hi to Paula, and Janis, and Janis’ birthday card is…
it’s not in the mail, cause she’s at the end of this month, right, the 31st?
Matt:
Correct.
Dave: And
is turning 8?
Matt:
Correct.
Dave: That
boggles my mind, that Janis Pearl is turning 8. I still picture her as a baby.
Matt: We
have a photo frame with a bunch of photos and one of them is Day One, within 3
hours of her being born, I picked her up and held her, and she reached her
little hand up to try to touch my face, and we got a picture of it, and every
time I walk past it, I’m like, “And that kid is now 4 feet tall, and dancin’
and runnin’ around and just… a barrel of energy” and I think, “she was so
sweet. What happened?”
Dave: I remember
the birth announcement where you wrote, “Look upon my works, ye mighty, and
tremble.”
Matt: Yep.
Dave:
[laughs] That still cracks me up.
Matt: When
Natasha was born, I went online and I posted the video of John Hurt at the
dinner scene from “Alien” and said, “if you know what’s going on, you’ll
understand.” And everybody went, “there’s something wrong with you, Matt.” And
I followed-up with the 1933 Universal Frankenstein “It’s alive, it’s alive. Now
I know what it feels like to be a God.”
Dave: [laughs]
Matt: And
everybody understood what I was talkin’ about after that one!
Dave:
Okay, good. And they still look at you funny.
Matt: Oh
yeah, everybody looks at me funny.
Dave:
Alright. Alright, you have a good one, and we will talk to you in April.
Matt: Yep!
Have a good one, Dave. Take care.
Dave: You
too. Buh-bye.
_____________________________________Next Time: "HEY."
1 comment:
Dave's a weird dude. His views of feminism seem as accurate as ever (ask me again about him ignoring the definitive refutation of No. 3 of his "X Impossible things"). And he doesn't believe in correcting himself before he releases his work? We used to call that "revising" or "editing" or "being a good writer". And he still seems to think that "atheist" means someone who is not an Abrahamic monotheist. Weird dude.
I've been enjoying the remastered phonebooks, and it would be too bad if there were no more of them. There are somewhere between 200 and 4,000 Cerebus fans left in the world, and perhaps that is just not a large enough market to support the remastering project. As a conservative, Dave will of course accept the judgement of the marketplace: there is no audience for Cerebus.
I'm still (trepidatiously) looking forward to Strange Death. Let's hope it's as good as the promise it showed when it was the best thing in Glamourpuss.
-- Damian
Post a Comment